Monthly Archives: February 2019

Tree trimming guidelines in Edison wildfire plan may go too far, arborist says

La Canada Valley Sun News
Feb 28, 2019

READ ARTICLE HERE

A tree was carved out to create a 12-foot clearance for the top power lines on Oakwood Avenue on Monday The trees are being trimmed by Southern California Edison tree trimming crews to protect power lines, but arborists are citing examples of how the trimming could be harmful.
(Tim Berger / La Cañada Valley Sun)

Southern California Edison is making big plans to reduce the chances of fire ignition in high-risk areas like La Cañada Flintridge, proposing to spend more than $118 million throughout its service area on enhanced vegetation management between now and 2020.

As part of a 119-page Wildfire Mitigation Plan, required by state law and submitted to the California Public Utilities Commission Feb. 6, the utility aims to reduce threats posed by falling trees and hanging limbs near power lines by removing at least 7,500 trees (with funding being sought for the removal of up to 15,000) in 2019 and maintaining a 12-foot clearance around all electrical wires.

Contracted work crews have been busy on the streets of La Cañada and neighboring Altadena in recent months, trimming or topping trees to accommodate the new radial requirement, far greater than the 4 feet standard previously imposed.

The results of their labor — visible on several La Cañada residential streets north of Foothill Boulevard — is causing concern among residents and at least one arborist who fear such extreme pruning could imperil the health of certain tree species.

“They’re topping trees, which are going to go into a permanent state of decline,” said Rebecca Latta, a longtime arborist who has clients in La Cañada. “They need to do a better job of explaining to us why they need to go to 12 feet.”

Vegetation poses a threat

In a Wildfire Town Hall forum held last week at Pasadena High School officials from Edison International and the CPUC explained maintaining vegetation was a chief concern.

“We collect statistics on ignitions,” said Elizaveta Malashenko, deputy executive director for CPUC’s Office of Safety and Enforcement. “At 25%, the top No. 1 cause is vegetation contact with power lines.”


Local arborist Rebecca Latta on Hook Tree Road with a topped off deodar cedar behind her. ““They’re topping trees, which are going to go into a permanent state of decline,” she says.
(Tim Berger / La Cañada Valley Sun)

Between 2015 and 2017, 132 ignitions occurred in the distribution voltage infrastructure that carries power from substations to customers in Edison’s high risk fire areas, the utility’s mitigation plan indicates. Of those, contact from vegetation accounted for 22 fires, or 17%.

Vegetation-related ignitions in higher voltage transmission infrastructure, which carries power from power plants to substations, was lower with only one instance during the same two-year period, accounting for 5% of fires.

Pedro Pizarro, president and chief executive of Edison International, told the town hall audience his utility inspects and trims more than 400,000 trees in high risk fire areas each year.

“We know that homeowners care deeply for their surrounding environment and foliage, and we want to respect that,” he said. “However, we will prioritize safety of your home and our communities first and foremost, so we will trim trees when needed.”

Crews on the march

Following orders to maintain adequate clearance, some 400 contractor work crews consisting of at least one groundsman and one foreman are inspecting private trees on residential streets throughout Edison’s territory and notifying customers when work is needed.

La Cañada is an area of high concern, according to David Guzman, who oversees Edison’s vegetation management program.

“There are a lot of trees in that area, it has a dense population, and it’s at an interface with the [Angeles National] Forest, so it’s definitely something we look at closely,” he said.

In the past, branches were trimmed back to a 4-foot radius around trees, with fast-growing species receiving at least 6 more feet of pruning, Guzman said. But since the CPUC passed a new regulation in December 2017 recommending a 12-foot clearance for all vegetation in high-fire-risk areas — even when lines are covered or insulated — the particular species of a tree no longer factors into the pruning.

“We have a basic, across-the-board trim area of 12 feet,” Guzman said, adding arborists pre-inspect trees and perform quality control work of about 30% of grid work to ensure clearance.

Latta worries over-trimmed trees may suffer and become even greater fire hazards.

“If you top the tree you expose the whole upper canopy to sunburn. And if you have any other issues going on, root rot or other health problems, the tree doesn’t have enough resources to defend itself,” she said, naming deodar cedars and some pines as particularly vulnerable.

The arborist also claimed some homeowners were not receiving proper notice before trim work was done on their property.

Guzman said customers receive door hanger notifications from inspectors at least 30 days in advance and a second notice days before trimming is scheduled. If people cannot reach the number provided, Guzman recommended calling Edison at 1 (800) 655-4555 and asking for a vegetation management manager who can look up properties and report details.

Despite the established notification process, Pizarro warned residents at the Feb. 21 Wildfire Town Hall public safety trumps standard operating procedures.

“Of course we want to give advance notice, but if we see something we think is a hazard we’ll take it on the spot,” he said.

Locals want more input

Edison’s enhanced vegetation management plan just doesn’t sit right with La Cañada resident Taylor Carbonetti, who had a crew perform some trimming at her Hill Street home but was shocked to see what she considers over-pruning in several other parts of town.

“It looks like if you were making paper trees and you just took scissors and took all the tops off — it’s intense,” said Carbonetti, who went on Facebook to inform neighbors. “You’re walking around and start noticing all these trees are chopped. And we’re seeing the trucks everywhere.”

Meanwhile, Latta said she appreciates Edison’s efforts to keep at-risk foothills communities safe, but wishes they would have developed a more collaborative approach with input from stakeholders. She’s currently trying to raise awareness in local arborist circles.

“It’s not my intention to do anything other than get their attention and get them to develop some options,” she said. “Why is it we’re not being allowed to be part of the conversation?”

Utilities Declare War on Trees in Name of Fire Safety

from The Arroyo Lookout
by William Kelly

William Kelly is co-publisher of California Currenta weekly news service on the energy utility industry in California and the West. He writes on environmental and energy issues for the Los Angeles Times, San Francisco Chronicle, Inside Climate News, LA Weekly, Scientific American, and Alternet.

READ the full text of article HERE


The trees in this South Pasadena neighborhood were topped by Southern California Edison.

Oaks and other trees in California and along the Arroyo Seco beware!

It’s open season on trees for California’s three major investor-owned utilities. They plan to cut down about 400,000 trees along power lines this year and severely trim others ostensibly to prevent blazes in areas with elevated wildfire risk, which encompass more than 30 percent of the state’s land mass.

And this year’s just the warm up. Utility topping and chopping is planned to continue for the next eight years.


While there’s little question that power lines have sparked large and destructive wildfires, the plans do not rank how effectively the individual measures will actually reduce risk.


The three utilities plan to remove and top trees as part of so-called “enhanced vegetation management” programs outlined to the California Public Utilities Commission as part of wildfire safety plans. The safety plans were filed with the commission early this month in response to last year’s hasty enactment of SB 901 in response to the growing climate change driven danger of wildfires.

The plans, which are required under the law, are targeted for approval by May, according to CPUC President Mike Picker.

They outline a host of steps the utilities plan to undertake at a cost of about $3 billion a year to prevent their power lines from sparking fires. The money is to be collected from utility ratepayers.

A major part of the utility plans will be an intensive eight-year effort to clear any trees that may potentially fall on power lines or top them so they remain below lines. The plans, which contain dozens of separate safety measures, also call for shutting power down when winds blow, insulating lines, strengthening power poles, and putting lines in fire prone areas underground.

Some consumer advocates, like The Utility Reform Network Attorney Marcel Hawiger, fear some of the measures are redundant and could simply drive up what utilities charge ratepayers without commensurate fire risk reduction. The monopoly utilities have motive, they fear, since they’re guaranteed a rate of return, or profit, of about 10 percent on capital expenditures.

READ MORE HERE>